350
edits
Calendar:Architecture: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
(reply) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 209: | Line 209: | ||
'''Re: We think you miss our point that transaction '''vanish''' after being committed.''' | '''Re: We think you miss our point that transaction '''vanish''' after being committed.''' | ||
'''jminta says:''' This table is written from the point of view of an observer receiving a notification of a change, in which case the transaction will still be around. | '''jminta says:''' This table is written from the point of view of an observer receiving a notification of a change, in which case the transaction will still be around. '''Re: No, calling on a committed transaction object leads to an exception, and is bug.''' | ||
In short, both methods involve some type of enumeration. What we need to examine, in my mind, is which enumeration is easier from a coding/performance perspective. | In short, both methods involve some type of enumeration. What we need to examine, in my mind, is which enumeration is easier from a coding/performance perspective. | ||
I'd like to thank everyone who worked on this model. There are some good ideas here, and regardless of whether this model is adopted or not, I think discussion of the proposals here will signifcantly benefit calendar development. | I'd like to thank everyone who worked on this model. There are some good ideas here, and regardless of whether this model is adopted or not, I think discussion of the proposals here will signifcantly benefit calendar development. | ||