Talk:Search Service:User Interface Design: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 17: Line 17:
     | @  v| | http://example.com      | | > Go |
     | @  v| | http://example.com      | | > Go |
     +------+ +-------------------------+ +------+
     +------+ +-------------------------+ +------+
    +-----------------------+
    | @ url                |
    | @ Google (/g/)        |
    | @ Google Images (/gi/)|
    | @ Froogle (/froo/)    |
    | @ Amazon.com (/am/)  |
    | @ IMDB (/imdb/)      |
    | @ Bugzilla (/bug/)    |
    | --------------------- |
    |  Edit this list...  |
    +-----------------------+
</pre>


After selection the user can use the location bar for his search term.
After selection the user can use the location bar for his search term.
Line 79: Line 67:


[[User:Markus Schmaus|Markus Schmaus]] 18:42, 23 Feb 2006 (PST)
[[User:Markus Schmaus|Markus Schmaus]] 18:42, 23 Feb 2006 (PST)
=== Cons ===
* User has to use the pull down menu to access the search functionality. (If he doesn't use keywords.)
[[User:Markus Schmaus|Markus Schmaus]] 14:59, 26 Feb 2006 (PST)


=== Comments from beltzner ===
=== Comments from beltzner ===
Line 87: Line 80:


One of the reasons that the current search field is so successful is that it is a clear place for the user to search. Mozilla had keyword search for a long time, and it wasn't well discovered or frequently used. I'm not sure reverting to that format is the best thing for the general user.
One of the reasons that the current search field is so successful is that it is a clear place for the user to search. Mozilla had keyword search for a long time, and it wasn't well discovered or frequently used. I'm not sure reverting to that format is the best thing for the general user.
: You're right, reverting back to keyword search only is not a good idea. Even though command-line like interfaces are fast and comfortable once you know them, they are very hard to discover and learn. There should always be a graphical interface for them as well. Hence I'm suggesting to combine the power of keyword search with the accessibility of a pull down menu. This does not only provide a way for mouse centric useres to access this feature it also gives a hint toward the command-line like interface, which can thus be more easily discovered by interested users.
: The usability can probabily be increased by using more space for the pull down menu. This additional space is more then compensated by the space saved by using only a single text field.
<pre>
    +------------------+ +-------------------------+ +------+
    | @ Google (/g/): v| | search term            | | > Go |
    +------------------+ +-------------------------+ +------+
</pre>
<pre>
    +----------+ +---------------------------------+ +------+
    | @ Open: v| | example.com                    | | > Go |
    +----------+ +---------------------------------+ +------+
</pre>
: The most recent search engine can also be presented as the first entry in the pull down menu.
<pre>
    +----------+ +---------------------------------+ +------+
    | @ Open: v| | example.com                    | | > Go |
    +----------+ +---------------------------------+ +------+
    +-----------------------+
    | @ Amazon.com (/am/)  |
    +-----------------------+
    | @ Open                |
    | @ Google (/g/)        |
    | @ Google Images (/gi/)|
    | @ Froogle (/froo/)    |
    | @ Amazon.com (/am/)  |
    | @ IMDB (/imdb/)      |
    | @ Bugzilla (/bug/)    |
    | --------------------- |
    |  Edit this list...  |
    +-----------------------+
</pre>
: This is only a suggestion, which hopefully would not only improve usability for power users but also for others. It would lose the persistance of the search bar, but the big advatage would be space. [[User:Markus Schmaus|Markus Schmaus]] 14:59, 26 Feb 2006 (PST)

Navigation menu