Firefox/Planning/2010-01-13: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
(lorentz, more details)
Line 50: Line 50:


= Localization =
= Localization =
* Lorentz l10n changes:
** build systems will be up for both lorentz and 1.9.2 in parallel, including dashboards
** added strings will be ignored on 1.9.2 with fallback strings on lorentz, so lorentz will report them missing, 1.9.2 will not report them obsolete
** localizations and language packs made for 3.6 will continue to work thanks to the fallback strings
** no string removals for lorentz, so l10n targeting lorentz will work on 1.9.2 pre-lorentz
* Search repackaging changes with Lorentz? Multi-locale builds want the search engines to be in the jar, which we're doing for fennec, but not for Firefox desktop. Changing that without testers in the wild scares Pike, maybe Lorentz has the coverage we need?
* Locale updates for firedrills and -like releases, are we actually more safe on regular releases? What would it take to feel good about taking them? Yes, Pike wants to take them, still.


= QA =
= QA =
Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
2,976

edits

Navigation menu