Electrolysis/Jetpack: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Clarifications about existing CPOW limitations
m (Add clarification)
m (Clarifications about existing CPOW limitations)
Line 48: Line 48:
   }
   }


In either instance, the chrome process will end up calling the CPOW callback using a CPOW document object (assuming content processes exist).
In either instance, the chrome process will end up calling the Jetpack CPOW callback using a content CPOW document object (assuming content processes exist).


Note that the solutions as described are currently un-implementable, because there's no way to pass the document object to the CPOW callback as a parameter.  We need chrome -> jetpack CPOWs for that to work, and they don't exist yet.
Note that the solutions as described are currently un-implementable for certain circumstances, because there's no way to pass chrome objects to the CPOW callback as a parameter.  We need reverse (chrome -> jetpack) CPOWs for that to work, and they don't exist yet.


The upside is that jQuery should Just Work as soon as the chrome -> jetpack CPOWs do exist.
The upside is that jQuery should Just Work as soon as the chrome -> jetpack CPOWs do exist.
Confirmed users
512

edits

Navigation menu