Confirmed users
300
edits
Feed Handling:User Interface: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→User Comments
Brkwtzandrew (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
* Honestly, Feeds should be stored in a single localized location by default for easier management, should (as mentioned above) notify of updates, and should most definately allow for the aggregation of unread feed entries into a single list. The biggest advantage of feeds is allowing a user to access information from multiple sources in a single place. --[[User:Trillinon|Jeff Carlsen]] 10:44, 20 Nov 2005 (PST) | * Honestly, Feeds should be stored in a single localized location by default for easier management, should (as mentioned above) notify of updates, and should most definately allow for the aggregation of unread feed entries into a single list. The biggest advantage of feeds is allowing a user to access information from multiple sources in a single place. --[[User:Trillinon|Jeff Carlsen]] 10:44, 20 Nov 2005 (PST) | ||
* Maybe I'm missing it, but what about feeds that are already styled through XSLT? Will this completely obfuscate easy ways of creating Livemarks from them? At the very least, the Bookmarks Menu needs to be able to look at the page and see if its a feed or not, and then show the option to add a Livemark to it. Seems like the functionality will still be awfully hidden though. --[[User:Wjjohnst|Wes]] 10:31, 10 Dec 2006 (CST) | |||