Mobile/Notes/28-Jul-2010: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
* {{bug|550936}} (InstallTrigger) ready to land once an xpconnect bug, {{bug|582100}} is done (which they say should be soon)
* {{bug|550936}} (InstallTrigger) ready to land once an xpconnect bug, {{bug|582100}} is done (which they say should be soon)
* {{bug|573635}} has two ways to resolve it, and we have patches for both. Neither is perfect but a perfect solution requires fundamental work on IPC networking. So for now, just need to decide which of the 2 patches to go with.
* {{bug|573635}} has two ways to resolve it, and we have patches for both. Neither is perfect but a perfect solution requires fundamental work on IPC networking. So for now, just need to decide which of the 2 patches to go with.
== Layers ==
* Where are we with [[Mobile/Layers | Layers]]
** Retained layers code has created some bugs in Fennec {{bug|579349}}
** Low-level cross-process layers code v0 will land on e10s soon
** Shadow trees integrated into chrome-process invalidation and painting paths ([http://i30.tinypic.com/34jbrbq.png screen (offset is on purpose)])
** Content process still relying on having a widget; talked to Timothy/Rob about next step.  Advised to create "fake/stub" widget, got list of known-to-be-needed nsIWidget methods to implement.
** Gutted all platform widget code from dom/ipc and nsFrameLoader.  Breaks everything, to be fixed by cross-platform stub widget.
* Bugs to watch
** Tracking bug {{bug|574512}}
** e10s shadow tree {{bug|570620}}
** Integrate chrome hierarchy {{bug|130078}}


== General Platform ==
== General Platform ==
canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
2,798

edits

Navigation menu