Confirmed users
367
edits
JavaScript:SpiderMonkey:C++ Coding Style: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
JavaScript:SpiderMonkey:C++ Coding Style (view source)
Revision as of 05:19, 27 October 2010
, 27 October 2010→Namespaces
(→Classical OOP: Added inline style.) |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
* Compile-time-evaluated functions (i.e., template meta-functions) are kept in the "template library" namespace to avoid collision with their runtime counterparts. | * Compile-time-evaluated functions (i.e., template meta-functions) are kept in the "template library" namespace to avoid collision with their runtime counterparts. | ||
namespace js { namespace tl { ... } } | namespace js { namespace tl { ... } } | ||
* Avoid unnamed namespaces unless they are necessary to give a class's members internal linkage. Although the C++ standard officially deprecates 'static' on functions, 'static' has the following advantages: | |||
** It is difficult to name functions in unnamed namespaces in gdb. | |||
** Static says "this is a translation-unit-local helper function" on the function, without having to look around for an enclosing "namespace {". | |||
* Other namespaces? Are these names too short and likely to collide? | * Other namespaces? Are these names too short and likely to collide? | ||