Mozilla2:ImageLib: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
fix link to jpeg2000 faq
No edit summary
m (fix link to jpeg2000 faq)
Line 5: Line 5:
Isn't that illegal? JPEG2000 is heavily patented IIRC. Unless somebody's going to buy off the rights holders. And I didn't think mozilla.org had THAT sort of money. Anyway nobody uses JPEG2000, for this exact reason.
Isn't that illegal? JPEG2000 is heavily patented IIRC. Unless somebody's going to buy off the rights holders. And I didn't think mozilla.org had THAT sort of money. Anyway nobody uses JPEG2000, for this exact reason.


Why not just read the [[http://www.jpeg.org/faq.phtml?action=show_answer&question_id=q3f042a68b1081| JPEG2000 faq on patents]] instead of FUD-ing?
Why not just read the [http://www.jpeg.org/faq.phtml?action=show_answer&question_id=q3f042a68b1081 JPEG2000 FAQ on patents] instead of FUD-ing?
213

edits

Navigation menu