45
edits
Talk:Places:Bookmarks:Rethinking: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Scrambled Notes about Bookmarks:Rethinking
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
* '''Notes:''' integration looks great! It should include the tags field! I change tags frequently when I do research and work on projects. Tags and notes are just different annotations. Can I choose between left or bottom as notes location? (May be floating?) | * '''Notes:''' integration looks great! It should include the tags field! I change tags frequently when I do research and work on projects. Tags and notes are just different annotations. Can I choose between left or bottom as notes location? (May be floating?) | ||
* '''Search:''' MUST include title, (URL: recommend), tags, and notes! When I use my bash script to search all fields of the bookmarks I get a small percentage of unintended results but I prefer this simplistic approach with one search field that is similar to Google's. Additional specifiers such as inurl, site, etc. are only used for advanced search. | * '''Search:''' MUST include title, (URL: recommend), tags, and notes! When I use my bash script to search all fields of the bookmarks I get a small percentage of unintended results but I prefer this simplistic approach with one search field that is similar to Google's. Additional specifiers such as inurl, site, etc. are only used for advanced search. | ||
* '''Viewing Tags:''' I'm not sure about its function. It seems to offer the tags list and show all bookmarks with the selected tag. It seems equivalent to an advanced search like "tags:firefox". If I bookmark a website that has Firefox in its title | * '''Viewing Tags:''' I'm not sure about its function. It seems to offer the tags list and show all bookmarks with the selected tag. It seems equivalent to an advanced search like "tags:firefox". If I bookmark a website that has Firefox in its title why should I enter it again as a tag? I'm using tags to improve findability not to build a perfect structure of tags. I mean I need to add as tag or in notes information that is not in the title field so that I can integrate this website into my personal map of associations and knowledge. | ||
* '''Viewing Bookmarks:''' I'm wondering if a list style like del.icio.us bookmarks (e.g. http://del.icio.us/Tdot/firefox), Google's search results, or reddit's news items (http://reddit.com/) would be better than the table format. CSS would actually allow advanced users some hacking and personal adjustments. | * '''Viewing Bookmarks:''' I'm wondering if a list style like del.icio.us bookmarks (e.g. http://del.icio.us/Tdot/firefox), Google's search results, or reddit's news items (http://reddit.com/) would be better than the table format. CSS would actually allow advanced users some hacking and personal adjustments. | ||
* '''Viewing Notes:''' a del.icio.us like output seems here also a better solution and could integrate very well with bookmarks. To illustrate what I mean follow these two links: http://de.lirio.us/rubric/entries/tags/delirioussiteblog?long_form=1 http://de.lirio.us/rubric/entries/tags/delirioussiteblog The first link shows the complete item while the second link reduces it to the bookmark with a short summary. For Firefox I think three levels would be perfect: single line (bookmark + tags?), four lines (bookmark + tags + two lines of the notes), long form (incudes complete notes/annotations) | * '''Viewing Notes:''' a del.icio.us like output seems here also a better solution and could integrate very well with bookmarks. To illustrate what I mean follow these two links: http://de.lirio.us/rubric/entries/tags/delirioussiteblog?long_form=1 http://de.lirio.us/rubric/entries/tags/delirioussiteblog The first link shows the complete item while the second link reduces it to the bookmark with a short summary. For Firefox I think three levels would be perfect: single line (bookmark + tags?), four lines (bookmark + tags + two lines of the notes), long form (incudes complete notes/annotations) | ||