Talk:Mozilla Prototypes: Difference between revisions

no edit summary
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Suggestions for original work ==
url: leet.mozilla.org
== Pointers to existing projects we could sponsor / integrate / hack on ==
=== Metadata-related ===
* [http://microformats.org/ Microformats]
=== Identity-related ===
* [http://yadis.org Yadis]
=== Media-related ===
* [http://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/ Gnash]
* [http://www.videolan.org VLC]
* [http://www.djvuzone.org/ DjVu]
* [http://vorbis.com/ Vorbis]
=== Privacy-related ===
* [http://www.philzimmermann.com/EN/zfone/index.html ZPhone]
* [http://tor.eff.org/ Tor]
=== Download Processs Improvements-related ===
* [http://www.metalinker.org Metalink]
== Parallels with addons.mozilla.org ==
== Parallels with addons.mozilla.org ==


My initial thoughts were about the parallels between a project like this and adons.mozilla.org, where we could possibly leverage the same community interest to fuel participation in the prototyping of new featuers, etc.
My initial thoughts were about the parallels between a project like this and addons.mozilla.org, where we could possibly leverage the same community interest to fuel participation in the prototyping of new features, etc.


=== Getting People Involved ===
=== Getting People Involved ===
Line 38: Line 9:
* These Digg-like results could help us gauge public interest
* These Digg-like results could help us gauge public interest
* Could we possibly use addons.mozilla.org as the outlet for testing these prototypes?
* Could we possibly use addons.mozilla.org as the outlet for testing these prototypes?
=== The Add-on Sandbox Idea ===
There was some previous discussion about the creation of a sandbox on AMO that would be used for testing beta/alpha add-ons with limited liability -- would prototypes fall into a similar area, where users (not mom-and-pop users) could download and try these prototypes, after acknowledging that these tests may be unstable and are just proofs of concept?
1,071

edits