9
edits
User:Peter17/GSoC-2011: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
+last week
((base)) |
(+last week) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
After Spir solved the issue of failing tests (a memoization reset was needed), I added a lot of test cases for my parser and continued to develop it. | After Spir solved the issue of failing tests (a memoization reset was needed), I added a lot of test cases for my parser and continued to develop it. | ||
== May 25th to | == May 25th to Mat 31st == | ||
I spent a long time working on wikitable parsing. I added simple and semi-complex test cases and had them parsed correctly. | I spent a long time working on wikitable parsing. I added simple and semi-complex test cases and had them parsed correctly. | ||
I also added a [https://github.com/peter17/mediawiki-parser/blob/master/TODO.rst TODO file] which gives the current status of the different parts of MediaWiki syntax for my parser. | I also added a [https://github.com/peter17/mediawiki-parser/blob/master/TODO.rst TODO file] which gives the current status of the different parts of MediaWiki syntax for my parser. | ||
Erik had a look at my commits and corrected a space/tabs indentation problem. We have planned to communicate with each other by audio. | |||
== June 1st to June 8th == | |||
I managed to understand how to use comparisons in tests in Pijnu and adapted my tests to do so. | |||
I corrected the parsing of '=' in text lines which made me rewrite the parsing of titles, which now respect the behavior of MediaWiki. I added the support for nested tables and nested templates. | |||
I tested pyParsing a little more. This confirmed my opinion that Pijnu was the best PEG parsing library we had tested so far and was much more practical and easy to use than pyParsing. | |||
Spir informed me that he couldn't assume the development of Pijnu "in a foreseeable future"; after discussing this with him and with Erik, I decided to maintain it, keep the GPLv3 license and make the developments necessary to the continuation of our mediawiki parser (such as Unicode support). | |||
I had a long and helpful discussion with Erik about what was urgent, less urgent and not needed. It was said that the most urgent was to have a clear view of the pre/main/post-processing steps. I will write something about that as soon as possible, getting inspiration from how MediaWiki parser works. | |||
<!-- | |||
June 9th: add multiline tests in Pijnu and our parser | |||
--> | |||