Confirmed users
1,798
edits
Release Management/WER Investigation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Release Management/WER Investigation (view source)
Revision as of 01:50, 24 October 2011
, 24 October 2011→Breakpad/Soccoro
| Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
** (?) Can we make use of individual hit event info in general? (as opposed to just crash cabs) | ** (?) Can we make use of individual hit event info in general? (as opposed to just crash cabs) | ||
* (?) Will hangs (heap dumps) need to be handled any differently than minidumps? | * (?) Will hangs (heap dumps) need to be handled any differently than minidumps? | ||
** Hang blog posts: [https://blogs.msdn.com/themes/blogs/generic/post.aspx?WeblogApp=wer&y=2009&m=03&d=19&WeblogPostName=let-there-be-hangs-part-3-the-hungapp-module&GroupKeys= part 3] and [https://blogs.msdn.com/themes/blogs/generic/post.aspx?WeblogApp=wer&y=2009&m=03&d=19&WeblogPostName=let-there-be-hangs-part-4-better-bucketing-in-windows-vista&GroupKeys= part 4] | |||
** They are bucketed differently. On XP, "hangs really only have 2 effective bucketing parameters... all of particular version of an application’s hangs ended up in a single bucket." On Vista it's better, but "there are still edge cases (just as there are in crash bucketing) where a bucket does not uniquely identify a single bug." (^^ see blog posts) | |||
* (?) Who do we give access to minidumps? | * (?) Who do we give access to minidumps? | ||
* (?) What is our current data retention policy? | * (?) What is our current data retention policy? | ||