Confirmed users
1,798
edits
| Line 61: | Line 61: | ||
** Hang blog posts: [https://blogs.msdn.com/themes/blogs/generic/post.aspx?WeblogApp=wer&y=2009&m=03&d=19&WeblogPostName=let-there-be-hangs-part-3-the-hungapp-module&GroupKeys= part 3] and [https://blogs.msdn.com/themes/blogs/generic/post.aspx?WeblogApp=wer&y=2009&m=03&d=19&WeblogPostName=let-there-be-hangs-part-4-better-bucketing-in-windows-vista&GroupKeys= part 4] | ** Hang blog posts: [https://blogs.msdn.com/themes/blogs/generic/post.aspx?WeblogApp=wer&y=2009&m=03&d=19&WeblogPostName=let-there-be-hangs-part-3-the-hungapp-module&GroupKeys= part 3] and [https://blogs.msdn.com/themes/blogs/generic/post.aspx?WeblogApp=wer&y=2009&m=03&d=19&WeblogPostName=let-there-be-hangs-part-4-better-bucketing-in-windows-vista&GroupKeys= part 4] | ||
** They are bucketed differently. On XP, "hangs really only have 2 effective bucketing parameters... all of particular version of an application’s hangs ended up in a single bucket." On Vista it's better, but "there are still edge cases (just as there are in crash bucketing) where a bucket does not uniquely identify a single bug." (^^ see blog posts) | ** They are bucketed differently. On XP, "hangs really only have 2 effective bucketing parameters... all of particular version of an application’s hangs ended up in a single bucket." On Vista it's better, but "there are still edge cases (just as there are in crash bucketing) where a bucket does not uniquely identify a single bug." (^^ see blog posts) | ||
** Need to also understand how to represent [https://blogs.msdn.com/themes/blogs/generic/post.aspx?WeblogApp=wer&y=2010&m=08&d=16&WeblogPostName=xproc-application-hang-cabs-in-windows-7&GroupKeys= cross process hangs] | |||
* (?) Who do we give access to minidumps? | * (?) Who do we give access to minidumps? | ||
* (?) What is our current data retention policy? | * (?) What is our current data retention policy? | ||