Standards/W3C Charter Development and Review: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
spelling
(initial version)
 
m (spelling)
Line 21: Line 21:
charter.
charter.


At some point in this process, the charter is brough to the Advisory
At some point in this process, the charter is brought to the Advisory
Committee, which consists of one representative for each W3C member
Committee, which consists of one representative for each W3C member
company.  (Mozilla's current representative is [[User:Dbaron|David Baron]].)  Initially, the
company.  (Mozilla's current representative is [[User:Dbaron|David Baron]].)  Initially, the
Line 36: Line 36:
by the Advisory Committee (though AC members have the chance to object
by the Advisory Committee (though AC members have the chance to object
if they don't like the changes).  The comments by members are either
if they don't like the changes).  The comments by members are either
member-confidental (viewable by employees of members and by the W3C
member-confidential (viewable by employees of members and by the W3C
team, under confidence) or team-confidental (viewable only by the team).
team, under confidence) or team-confidential (viewable only by the team).


Mozilla typically discusses charter reviews on the dev-platform mailing
Mozilla typically discusses charter reviews on the dev-platform mailing
canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
1,334

edits

Navigation menu