L10n:Locale Codes: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Add paragraph about dialect part of codes
(Add some first content to that page, mostly copied and reformatted from User:KaiRo)
 
(Add paragraph about dialect part of codes)
Line 23: Line 23:


As a side note, the [http://www.mozilla-world.org/ mozilla-world.org] domain (operated by [http://www.mozilla-europe.org/ Mozilla Europe]) now shortens locale names in that way by default (after I had some talk with peterv about that matter), see their language navigation at the bottom.
As a side note, the [http://www.mozilla-world.org/ mozilla-world.org] domain (operated by [http://www.mozilla-europe.org/ Mozilla Europe]) now shortens locale names in that way by default (after I had some talk with peterv about that matter), see their language navigation at the bottom.
After recent discussions, someone wanting to register for venetian, which has no ISO 639.2 code, and some of our people even reading the [http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3066 "language tag" RFC 3066], it seems we want to support the third (dialect) part of locale codes as well. That's extremely useful for languages that have no IS 639.2 code defined, as we can use a generic code (like e.g. roa) and add the [http://www.ethnologue.com/codes/default.asp SIL code] as the "dialect" identifier. This way, we stay inside standardized values and can nicely support those languages we had problems with in the old scheme.
Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,083

edits

Navigation menu