User:Auk/Bookmarks: Difference between revisions

Here are my thoughts on the future of bookmarking in Firefox. This draft is a KISS outlook, and personally preferred in favor of my [[user:auk/Tag_Model|Tagging Model]]. While the tag model comes from the point of view that the current bookmarks model must not be broken, and so adds next-gen technology onto that, this model throws out what has been before (for the most part) and builds a system that is simple but effective and — hopefully — in the long run easier to use.

A given url can be bookmarked or not bookmarked. There is not so much 'adding' a bookmark as 'bookmarking a page'. If a page is in the bookmark index, Bookmarks -> Bookmark This Page appears checked, and the Bookmark toolbar toggle button appears toggled on.

When a page is bookmarked, it's text should be scanned, common words and characters (the, a, comma, period) removed, and the text saved (space delimiters for words?) in the SQLite .db file.

This should be carried on in the background, or perhaps simply a progress bar in the statusbar, and not stop the UI usage flow — no Add dialog, no nothing, but a toggled button.

In accordance with [[user:auk/Bookmarks#Manual tagging|manual tagging]], the toolbar button could feature a drop-down with a 'Tag option'...or something.

Ever accidentally hit delete on a bookmark? Might it have changed your life if you still had it? It would be a little wasteful to keep all data for bookmarks that are supposed to be deleted, so I have decided on a compromise.

When a bookmark is deleted, the description, index, and all data ''except the title and URI'' are deleted from the DB. In addition, the 'deleted' flag is set to True.

In the UI, you can resurrect bookmarks (by navigating to a special Trash...directory) and their other data is then repopulated and the deleted flag set False.

I feel the primary mechanism of finding a bookmark should be searching. Some may argue this is a technical user's way of operating — text en lieu of point-and-click. However, I've watched many (my parents, generic other non-techies and techies alike) pull up Google in favor of thier bookmarks time and time again.

Why? This had been said before by more knowledgeable people, so I'll keep it brief. A search can be succint and generic at the same time. Documents have many aspects, few of which a user will remember at any given time. Search allows taking just one of these and jumping straight to it. I often find myself checking multiple folders in my bookmarks because the first folder I checked, which applied to one aspect of the page, is not where I put it.

A problem with removing words from the text index is that it makes it nearly illegible to humans. E.g., we can rule out showing excerpts in search results (again like Google). Perhaps it would be better to index the joining words as well, and skip over them in the search algorithm with a blacklist.

* Autocomplete in the URL bar

However, there are disadvantages <span lang="fr" style="font-style: italic">aussi</span>. The main one is speed. Waiting for the autocomplete suggestions to pop up or watching results appear at noticeably different times can be confusing and irritating.

Putting an entry in the search bar is the most obvious option. Basically, this has the (dis)advantages that are the opposite of autocomplete in the url bar.

We could show the most recently used/added bookmarks, or the ones flagged important (also show up on bookmarks toolbar).

* NOT create a bookmark account with an install of Firefox. Online bookmark account must be created EXPLICITLY, and the password and username chosen then. When a user installs Firefox, their bookmarks and other user data are completely isolated on their local drive.