Account confirmers, Anti-spam team, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
4,925
edits
IDN Display Algorithm: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
No characters in the identifier can be outside of the [http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/#Identifier_Characters Identifier | No characters in the identifier can be outside of the [http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/#Identifier_Characters Identifier Profile]. | ||
Profile]. | |||
All characters in each identifier must be from a single script, or from | All characters in each identifier must be from a single script, or from | ||
| Line 57: | Line 56: | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
I believe the | I believe the Identifier Profile is defined for us by the IDNA standard. When we upgrade to IDNA 2008 (a separate discussion), | ||
that should hopefully eliminate a large number of non-alphabet characters for us. | that should hopefully eliminate a large number of non-alphabet characters for us. | ||
| Line 64: | Line 63: | ||
they use multiple scripts at once. | they use multiple scripts at once. | ||
[http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/#Mixed_Script_Detection Unicode | [http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr39/#Mixed_Script_Detection Unicode Technical Report 39] has some more ideas for refinements. | ||
We should look at that carefully and decide which ones to adopt. | We should look at that carefully and decide which ones to adopt. | ||