Confirmed users
250
edits
(mention another use case (porting old add-ons)) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
* Repacking might be simpler, or not required at all | * Repacking might be simpler, or not required at all | ||
* Scratchpad could be used as an offline version of the Add-on Builder. | * Scratchpad could be used as an offline version of the Add-on Builder. | ||
* Old school add-ons can more easily leverage features from the | * Old school add-ons can more easily leverage features from the add-on sdk, which should help them port older add-ons. | ||
|Feature dependencies=* Packageless Jetpack proposal may be a dependency ([https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/wiki/JEP-packageless view]) | |Feature dependencies=* Packageless Jetpack proposal may be a dependency ([https://github.com/mozilla/addon-sdk/wiki/JEP-packageless view]) | ||
|Feature requirements=* Add-on SDK loader and API libraries are shipped inside Firefox, removing the necessity of packaging them inside each add-on. | |Feature requirements=* Add-on SDK loader and API libraries are shipped inside Firefox, removing the necessity of packaging them inside each add-on. | ||