Confirmed users
856
edits
Fennec/NativeUI/checkerboarding: Difference between revisions
→Eideticker
m (→Eideticker) |
|||
| Line 75: | Line 75: | ||
* XUL and native fennec run the page at different zoom levels and scroll to different locations | * XUL and native fennec run the page at different zoom levels and scroll to different locations | ||
* Eideticker is useful for cross-browser comparisons, but should we consider using other/methods tools (i.e. ones that don't require specialized hardware) for testing performance as well? | * Eideticker is useful for cross-browser comparisons, but should we consider using other/methods tools (i.e. ones that don't require specialized hardware) for testing performance as well? | ||
* Tracking FPS of scroll & zoom would be most useful. | |||
== When are we done? == | == When are we done? == | ||
* What criteria do we have for being good enough? | * What criteria do we have for being good enough? | ||