Confirmed users
210
edits
Espressive (talk | contribs) |
Espressive (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
* The lack of MXR parity; the completely unintelligible results for any non-plaintext search on DAO; the lack of example searches on DAO; | * The lack of MXR parity; the completely unintelligible results for any non-plaintext search on DAO; the lack of example searches on DAO; | ||
*dxr.allizom seemingly displays files in last-touched order, not alphabetical. The query box on allizom seems to only accept search queries; entering a path will show search results for the string but not open the file. Browsing and searching seem to be distinctly separate in the UI; I can't switch between the two easily. (Admittedly I can't with MXR either, but I have years of search-URL address bar muscle memory, so it's no longer a hindrance there.) | *dxr.allizom seemingly displays files in last-touched order, not alphabetical. The query box on allizom seems to only accept search queries; entering a path will show search results for the string but not open the file. Browsing and searching seem to be distinctly separate in the UI; I can't switch between the two easily. (Admittedly I can't with MXR either, but I have years of search-URL address bar muscle memory, so it's no longer a hindrance there.) | ||
*"Too much JS magic; that ends up more likely to be broken. Feels slower than mxr. (I have crappy machines, so more work on the client ends up doing that) I can't search anything but possibly-somewhat-outdated mozilla-central. (In my case, I'd like to search ESR, and sometimes CVS)" | |||
=== Is there anything in MXR that you miss in the DXR service? === | === Is there anything in MXR that you miss in the DXR service? === | ||