Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
1,737
edits
Update:Remora Feedback: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Alpha Feedback
| Line 101: | Line 101: | ||
The feedback (bugs, suggestions) that we fixed/dealt with were moved to a [[Update:Remora Feedback/Alpha Feedback Fixed|reference page]]. | The feedback (bugs, suggestions) that we fixed/dealt with were moved to a [[Update:Remora Feedback/Alpha Feedback Fixed|reference page]]. | ||
If your comments/name has been removed from this page, your comments have either been fixed, or moved to bugzilla. Thanks. --clouserw, 2006-02-28 | |||
== wenzel's comments == | == wenzel's comments == | ||
* Search algorithm is improvable: The binary matching creates many hits with the same score in spite of their obviously different relevance. | * Search algorithm is improvable: The binary matching creates many hits with the same score in spite of their obviously different relevance. | ||
* "find similar add-ons" sometimes shows different categories with the same name? ([http://preview.addons.mozilla.org/en-US/addons/display/398 example]) | * "find similar add-ons" sometimes shows different categories with the same name? ([http://preview.addons.mozilla.org/en-US/addons/display/398 example]) | ||
== Dao's comments == | == Dao's comments == | ||
* I don't see how the user is expected to find, say, Thunderbird extensions. AMO2 was too Firefox-centric, AMO3 seems even worse. http://www.erweiterungen.de/ does this better. | * I don't see how the user is expected to find, say, Thunderbird extensions. AMO2 was too Firefox-centric, AMO3 seems even worse. http://www.erweiterungen.de/ does this better. | ||
** answer from cameleon: I fill the [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367574 Bug 367574] – Ability to filter search of an Add-ons by application (Firefox or Thunderbird) on bugzilla about this problem. | ** answer from cameleon: I fill the [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=367574 Bug 367574] – Ability to filter search of an Add-ons by application (Firefox or Thunderbird) on bugzilla about this problem. | ||
== RenegadeX's comments == | == RenegadeX's comments == | ||
* On an [http://preview.addons.mozilla.org/en-US/addons/display/138 Extension(or Theme)'s page], you have the Extension Name followed by Version# on the same line (good to see it back, thanks - v2 was not good). Further down the page you have Version# and timestamp, which is thus partially redundant & a waste of space. Suggestion: go back to something closer to v1's implementation ([http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/9222/amoextensionspage2oldlo0.jpg screenshot]) which put it all at the top. Clean it up a little by putting the 'released on..' on its own line. | * On an [http://preview.addons.mozilla.org/en-US/addons/display/138 Extension(or Theme)'s page], you have the Extension Name followed by Version# on the same line (good to see it back, thanks - v2 was not good). Further down the page you have Version# and timestamp, which is thus partially redundant & a waste of space. Suggestion: go back to something closer to v1's implementation ([http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/9222/amoextensionspage2oldlo0.jpg screenshot]) which put it all at the top. Clean it up a little by putting the 'released on..' on its own line. | ||
== Yoko's comments == | == Yoko's comments == | ||
| Line 137: | Line 118: | ||
* The thunderbird's and nvu's extensions are not very easy to find. | * The thunderbird's and nvu's extensions are not very easy to find. | ||
* I think that it's will good to multiply the section of extension. By exemple the developer tools's extensions can to be split in "PHP extension", "javascript extension", "webmaster extension", etc | * I think that it's will good to multiply the section of extension. By exemple the developer tools's extensions can to be split in "PHP extension", "javascript extension", "webmaster extension", etc | ||
== Dolske's comments == | == Dolske's comments == | ||
| Line 184: | Line 162: | ||
Hmm, I guess that's enough comments for now! :-) | Hmm, I guess that's enough comments for now! :-) | ||
== Juan's comments == | == Juan's comments == | ||