Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
1,737
edits
Update:Remora Feedback: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Alpha Feedback
| Line 105: | Line 105: | ||
== wenzel's comments == | == wenzel's comments == | ||
* Search algorithm is improvable: The binary matching creates many hits with the same score in spite of their obviously different relevance. | * Search algorithm is improvable: The binary matching creates many hits with the same score in spite of their obviously different relevance. | ||
== RenegadeX's comments == | == RenegadeX's comments == | ||
* On an [http://preview.addons.mozilla.org/en-US/addons/display/138 Extension(or Theme)'s page], you have the Extension Name followed by Version# on the same line (good to see it back, thanks - v2 was not good). Further down the page you have Version# and timestamp, which is thus partially redundant & a waste of space. Suggestion: go back to something closer to v1's implementation ([http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/9222/amoextensionspage2oldlo0.jpg screenshot]) which put it all at the top. Clean it up a little by putting the 'released on..' on its own line. | * On an [http://preview.addons.mozilla.org/en-US/addons/display/138 Extension(or Theme)'s page], you have the Extension Name followed by Version# on the same line (good to see it back, thanks - v2 was not good). Further down the page you have Version# and timestamp, which is thus partially redundant & a waste of space. Suggestion: go back to something closer to v1's implementation ([http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/9222/amoextensionspage2oldlo0.jpg screenshot]) which put it all at the top. Clean it up a little by putting the 'released on..' on its own line. | ||
== Dolske's comments == | == Dolske's comments == | ||
Overall it's looking good! Here are my comments: | Overall it's looking good! Here are my comments: | ||
* The little orange arrow in the green "install now" link looks too much like a UI element, implying a dropdown menu there. | * The little orange arrow in the green "install now" link looks too much like a UI element, implying a dropdown menu there. | ||
| Line 129: | Line 117: | ||
* "Mozilla is providing links to these applications as a courtesy, and makes no representations regarding the applications or any information related there to." Given the legalese disclaimer, is "We Recommend" ok to say? The disclaimer in the footer also seems to be forced to 3 centered lines. Can this be flowed like normal text, non-centered, so it doesn't take up so much space? | * "Mozilla is providing links to these applications as a courtesy, and makes no representations regarding the applications or any information related there to." Given the legalese disclaimer, is "We Recommend" ok to say? The disclaimer in the footer also seems to be forced to 3 centered lines. Can this be flowed like normal text, non-centered, so it doesn't take up so much space? | ||
** I reduced the margin so that looks a little better there! --[[User:Wenzel|wenzel]] 16:32, 2 February 2007 (PST) | ** I reduced the margin so that looks a little better there! --[[User:Wenzel|wenzel]] 16:32, 2 February 2007 (PST) | ||
* Can "Recommended Addons" be things other than extensions? If so, things at this level should be identified as to why type of addon they are. | * Can "Recommended Addons" be things other than extensions? If so, things at this level should be identified as to why type of addon they are. | ||
| Line 153: | Line 139: | ||
* If no discussions exist for an addon, don't show "See all discussions (0)". Just make it a single link (ala my previous reviews comment) | * If no discussions exist for an addon, don't show "See all discussions (0)". Just make it a single link (ala my previous reviews comment) | ||
== Juan's comments == | == Juan's comments == | ||
| Line 168: | Line 145: | ||
* Too much white space. | * Too much white space. | ||
* A *lot* depends on how "relevance" is determined when sorting the extensions. | * A *lot* depends on how "relevance" is determined when sorting the extensions. | ||
== Archaeopteryx' comments == | == Archaeopteryx' comments == | ||
| Line 174: | Line 150: | ||
* Add possibility to undo expand information in list view ("No, this isn't something for me") | * Add possibility to undo expand information in list view ("No, this isn't something for me") | ||
* Add a list of application categories (only add-ons for application A and so on) under the current navigation at the left (with icon would be good) | * Add a list of application categories (only add-ons for application A and so on) under the current navigation at the left (with icon would be good) | ||
* Add expand/reduce function to developer page (user info) | * Add expand/reduce function to developer page (user info) | ||
* "Adobe" vs. "Adobe Systems" on plugins page | * "Adobe" vs. "Adobe Systems" on plugins page | ||
* Maybe add the two ([https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/3682/ 1], [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/3698/ 2]) extensions which are able to convert input fields to search engines to the search engines home page - it's faster than writing the search plugin on his own. | * Maybe add the two ([https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/3682/ 1], [https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/3698/ 2]) extensions which are able to convert input fields to search engines to the search engines home page - it's faster than writing the search plugin on his own. | ||
| Line 190: | Line 162: | ||
* The +/- makes no sense unless there is a difference in size for the two views. Why should I have to click the + to see a screenshot instead of a blank space? The idea of folding the items is great, but when they are folded, they should take up much less space. Two lines max. | * The +/- makes no sense unless there is a difference in size for the two views. Why should I have to click the + to see a screenshot instead of a blank space? The idea of folding the items is great, but when they are folded, they should take up much less space. Two lines max. | ||
* Include links Fold all/Unfold all. | * Include links Fold all/Unfold all. | ||
* Will the search engine list be a full list like mycroft or a recommended list like on current AMO? If it is a recommended list, it should be localizable. The list at AMO right now is somewhat US centric. | * Will the search engine list be a full list like mycroft or a recommended list like on current AMO? If it is a recommended list, it should be localizable. The list at AMO right now is somewhat US centric. | ||