1,035
edits
L10n:Localization Process: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→START
(→START) |
(→START) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
The decision process (set of questions we go through) that factually happens in this stage is this: | The decision process (set of questions we go through) that factually happens in this stage is this: | ||
1 - Review of the language to better understand historical or social context for that language (Axel/Pascal handle this), if the language is considered contentious | 1 - Review of the language to better understand historical or social context for that language (Axel/Pascal handle this), if the language is considered contentious by for example, linguistic scholars, then we say "no" to the localizer and we should suggest they work to create a language pack^^ or ship a variant of an existing build.^ | ||
* | *^ closest examples of this are en-CA and en-ZA | ||
*^^ we can offer hosting the language pack in CVS/AMO (not shipped.locales), however this is l10n-drivers team contentious and is a conversation that still needs to be addressed, the issue for all language packs is that they break minor updates; we need help from Smedberg (see bug 334136) | |||
* | |||
2 - if yes, check if there is a team that exists that you can join | 2 - if yes, check if there is a team that exists that you can join | ||