Firebug: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
292 bytes added ,  23 May 2007
(Moved issue 166 from potential to non-issue; Added non-issue about requiring DOM Inspector)
Line 8: Line 8:


'''Disucssion:''' Joe feels that strict mode warnings need to be adjusted, so I filed [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381223 Bug 381223].
'''Disucssion:''' Joe feels that strict mode warnings need to be adjusted, so I filed [https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381223 Bug 381223].
I feel that if we are targeting this to web developers, the errors in chrome won't be an issue since those are not displayed by default.  However, if we expand the target group to Extension Developers, this will be a serious issue.  There are easily over 50 strict warnings with startup alone, so it will be next to impossible for extension authors to find their own strict warnings.  
I feel that if we are targeting this to web developers, the errors in chrome won't be an issue since those are not displayed by default.  However, if we expand the target group to Extension Developers, this will be a serious issue.  There are easily over 50 strict warnings with startup alone, so it will be next to impossible for extension authors to find their own strict warnings.
 
===[http://code.google.com/p/fbug/issues/detail?id=160&can=4&q= Issue 160 - Firebug lacks rull chrome under FreeBSD (and probably any platform except Darwin, Linux, linux-gnu, and WINNT)]===
'''Status:''' Researching.
 
'''Disucssion:''' Reporter posted a fix that I need to investigate more.


==Fixed Issues==
==Fixed Issues==
590

edits

Navigation menu