Performance/Status Meetings/2007-June-27: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 99: Line 99:


Followup on JS timing granularity: turns out that it's not JS timing errors after all! Instead, it's the synthetic load I was using, which was to multiply a pair of numbers. If the load is changed to be addition of numbers, the measured time is a clean linear function of the number of additions. So the mystery becomes one of why multiplication in JS sometimes takes about 16ms longer than expected, but at least we're not suspicious about our measurement tools.
Followup on JS timing granularity: turns out that it's not JS timing errors after all! Instead, it's the synthetic load I was using, which was to multiply a pair of numbers. If the load is changed to be addition of numbers, the measured time is a clean linear function of the number of additions. So the mystery becomes one of why multiplication in JS sometimes takes about 16ms longer than expected, but at least we're not suspicious about our measurement tools.
[[Performance/Status_Meetings/Related_Bugs|Related Bugs]]
2,088

edits

Navigation menu