Confirmed users
2,959
edits
B2G/QA/Test Plan Review: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Internal QA Workflow
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* Quality of the test cases itself | * Quality of the test cases itself | ||
* Understandability of test cases | * Understandability of test cases | ||
Quality of the test cases itself analyzes if the test cases for the feature sufficiently cover happy path and negative cases sufficiently for each user story. Understandability of the test cases analyzes if the test cases for the feature can be understood by a person who did not create the test cases to allow that same person to run that test case without ambiguity. | Quality of the test cases itself analyzes if the test cases for the feature sufficiently cover happy path and negative cases sufficiently for each user story. Understandability of the test cases analyzes if the test cases for the feature can be understood by a person who did not create the test cases to allow that same person to run that test case without ambiguity. | ||
| Line 22: | Line 19: | ||
* Understandability of test cases - review+ for pass, review- for needs work | * Understandability of test cases - review+ for pass, review- for needs work | ||
* Additional comments explaining rationale behind review decisions | * Additional comments explaining rationale behind review decisions | ||
'''Note: ''' One reviewer is the minimum requirement, but that should not stop you from getting more reviewers to look at your test cases if think there's value to having more reviewers. | |||
=== External Workflow === | === External Workflow === | ||