B2G/QA/Test Plan Review: Difference between revisions

B2G/QA/Test Plan Review (view source)

1 byte added , 22 April 2013

Confirmed users

2,959

edits

Revision as of 05:21, 22 April 2013 (view source) Jsmith (talk \| contribs) (→‎External Workflow) ← Older edit		Revision as of 05:21, 22 April 2013 (view source) Jsmith (talk \| contribs) (→‎External Workflow) Newer edit →
Line 36:		Line 36:

	To setup a review for test cases with external parties, you should generate a high-level list of the test cases with titles only in an etherpad or shared document that external parties can interact with. Then, the external parties can send his review results in the following form on a per role basis:		To setup a review for test cases with external parties, you should generate a high-level list of the test cases with titles only in an etherpad or shared document that external parties can interact with. Then, the external parties can send his review results in the following form on a per role basis:


	* Development Code Flow Coverage by Developer Lead - review+ for sufficient coverage, review- for coverage needing improvement		* Development Code Flow Coverage by Developer Lead - review+ for sufficient coverage, review- for coverage needing improvement