B2G/QA/Test Plan Review: Difference between revisions

B2G/QA/Test Plan Review (view source)

34 bytes added , 22 April 2013

Confirmed users

2,959

edits

Revision as of 05:28, 22 April 2013 (view source) Jsmith (talk \| contribs) (→‎Internal QA Workflow) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 05:29, 22 April 2013 (view source) Jsmith (talk \| contribs) (→‎Internal QA Workflow)
Line 22:		Line 22:


	~~Guidelines~~ of when to know that improvements are needed in reviews:		Here are guidelines of when to know that improvements are needed in reviews (i.e. issuing a review-):

	* If a single or few happy path cases are only covered, but other obvious non-happy path cases are not called out for, then that's a case to review- to improve quality test case cases		* If a single or few happy path cases are only covered, but other obvious non-happy path cases are not called out for, then that's a case to review- to improve quality test case cases