Confirmed users
1,643
edits
TPEPlatform/MediaRecorder: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Summary
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
Regarding to architecture of Encoding framework, please visit [[TPEPlatform/MediaEncoderFramework|"MediaEncoder Framework"]]. | Regarding to architecture of Encoding framework, please visit [[TPEPlatform/MediaEncoderFramework|"MediaEncoder Framework"]]. | ||
==Track Encoder Milestone== | |||
The following table reveals encode and associate container format we are going to support: | The following table reveals encode and associate container format we are going to support: | ||
{| class="fullwidth-table sortable" style="width: 100%;" | {| class="fullwidth-table sortable" style="width: 100%;" | ||
| Line 43: | Line 44: | ||
| WebM | | WebM | ||
|} | |} | ||
List pros and cons for each audio/ video codec. We need more clear view to prioritize codec support sequence. | |||
Requirements for a video codec, which is the way to we prioritize encoder support: | |||
#Image quality | |||
#Performance | |||
#Power consumption | |||
#Hardware support | |||
#Licensing | |||
==META Issues== | ==META Issues== | ||