Confirmed users
313
edits
Firefox/Australis Meeting Notes: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Firefox/Australis Meeting Notes (view source)
Revision as of 17:35, 12 September 2013
, 12 September 2013→9/5/2013
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
= 9/5/2013 = | = 9/5/2013 = | ||
* Milestone 9 | |||
** http://i.imgur.com/RnD9h.gif | |||
* Perf regression and other landing blockers | |||
** bug 880611 (ts_paint regression) | |||
*** We thought we could chalk this up to TabsInTitlebar._update and CustomizableUI.initialize and put this thing to bed, but that doesn't account for all of it. | |||
**** We're operating under the assumption that the remaining regression is related to the fact that reflows are (for some reason) slower on UX than they are on m-c. We're still trying to determine why that is the case. | |||
**** Gijs' analysis of reflows: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=902857#c31 | |||
** bug 902024 (TART regression) | |||
*** TART regression data: https://docs.google.com/a/mozilla.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Asj8iLTl0K0UdGJzVnVYYkJTSDREbndRWWFTLWNyS1E#gid=1 | |||
*** Bug 907544 has landed, which gives wins for both m-c and UX, but doesn't give UX much of an advantage (except that it seems to have caused us to beat m-c on tpaint for Windows XP - http://bit.ly/14uhJzz) | |||
*** We're still fishing for the cause here... we're creating some reflow profiles for layout to look at. We've got mstange on board to help us examine those. | |||
*** vladan is looking into getting bug 900524 fixed so we can get some better data on Windows XP | |||
** regression data: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Asj8iLTl0K0UdDcxemJEWVVXWTlKek1wR09iS2FsOXc#gid=0 | |||
* Bug tracking (8/29 to 9/5) | |||
** P1: -7 (net -4) | |||
** P2: -1 | |||
** P3: +1 | |||
** P4: +0 | |||
** P5: +2 | |||
** Firefox team coordination | |||
*** Need an update from Dao on bug 868640 (Implement private browsing indicator when menubar is hidden) | |||
**** Assigned for over 1 month, needinfo for 1 week | |||
**** Might need a new assignee at this point | |||
*** Still waiting on graphics from Stephen for bug 892076 (customize and help button in panel UI) | |||
**** Will ping on IRC | |||
** Cross-team coordination | |||
*** Our Jetpack issues have been resolved, big thanks to Gijs, Zer0, and Kwierso | |||
*** Gfx | |||
**** Bug 907544 was fixed by BenWa | |||
**** Still hoping we can get some attention on bugs 907546, 907426, 907542 | |||
***** We might want to reduce the priority of these (or remove blocking status entirely), since I found out yesterday that these will only really affect Windows Vista+, which we already kick butt on. | |||
****** Sounds good to me! | |||
*** Splitting up mochitest-bc (bug 819963) is no longer a blocker due to bug 894930 being fixed | |||
* Roundtable | |||
** https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=882009 | |||
* Action Items (Last Week) | |||
** (MattN) look for worst regressions on subtests across platforms | |||
*** https://docs.google.com/a/mozilla.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Asj8iLTl0K0UdGJzVnVYYkJTSDREbndRWWFTLWNyS1E&pli=1#gid=4 | |||
**** 10.6 is in the worst shape both in terms of the regression % (19.38%) and absolute times | |||
***** Can check if lion+ specific styles are related? MattN will look at this | |||
**** 10.7 (9%) is second worst | |||
*** Am I correct that we should still be leaning on XP to get that cleared, since that's the "major" platform that is regressing? | |||
**** Yes, I think so but we can investigate 10.6 in parallel | |||
* Action Items (New) | |||
** [mconley] Gather a TART profile on OS X 10.6 and 10.8 and determine why 10.6 is so slow | |||
=8/29/2013= | =8/29/2013= | ||