Security/Process/Agile: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
*[https://docs.google.com/a/mozilla.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlDw2hHXmVgCdHJlUVJ5TGcyYWZTbVlMOHBKU3Y4Z2c&usp=drive_web#gid=1 Sprint Overview GoogleDoc]
*[https://docs.google.com/a/mozilla.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlDw2hHXmVgCdHJlUVJ5TGcyYWZTbVlMOHBKU3Y4Z2c&usp=drive_web#gid=1 Sprint Overview GoogleDoc]
*[https://docs.google.com/a/mozilla.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlDw2hHXmVgCdFNtV0JNX091UWhKRTIxbTRKQl9FeHc&usp=drive_web#gid=0 StandUp GoogleDoc]
*[https://docs.google.com/a/mozilla.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlDw2hHXmVgCdFNtV0JNX091UWhKRTIxbTRKQl9FeHc&usp=drive_web#gid=0 StandUp GoogleDoc]
* [Risk Rating table] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/RiskRatings
==Preclearance criteria==
Bugs that need risk review:
* bugs not ready for a full appsec/opsec review but need a risk level assigned
** if a bug does not have a [score= in the whiteboard we will assume the bug is in this category
Bugs that need architecture review:
* Bug has a risk rating of medium or higher
* architecture diagrams are provided by the development team
Bugs ready for code review:
* bug has a risk review (i.e.[score=low] in the whiteboard)
* code is complete and link to it’s repository has been provided
* if necessary, a staging/dev environment has been provided for us that we can use to test against
* architecture/data flow or other diagrams have been provided by the development team appropriate for the level of risk identified for the bug
canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
2,776

edits

Navigation menu