Confirmed users
6,361
edits
QA/Firefox3/TestResults/RC1/RC2BugCandidates: Difference between revisions
QA/Firefox3/TestResults/RC1/RC2BugCandidates (view source)
Revision as of 20:29, 23 May 2008
, 23 May 2008→Bug Candidates for Triage
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
* '''[RC2?]''' {{Bug|434264}} mailto & webcal Handler are missing in the Applications Tab. L10n wanted? Same reason as other locale webhandlers. We want this for RC2. | * '''[RC2?]''' {{Bug|434264}} mailto & webcal Handler are missing in the Applications Tab. L10n wanted? Same reason as other locale webhandlers. We want this for RC2. | ||
* '''[RC2+][has patch][has review]''' {{bug|421482}} - This was discussed at the Tuesday meeting and is a decent perf win if we can get this in. It tends to make the UI unusable when the user hits this state, so it should be considered for an RC2. | * '''[RC2+][has patch][has review]''' {{bug|421482}} - This was discussed at the Tuesday meeting and is a decent perf win if we can get this in. It tends to make the UI unusable when the user hits this state, so it should be considered for an RC2. | ||
* {{bug|432599}} - Sounds like the feature is a little bit backwards. should be a small fix. | * <del> {{bug|432599}} - Sounds like the feature is a little bit backwards. should be a small fix. </del> Not blocking RC2. | ||
* {{bug|434837}} - sounds like something we really cannot ship with? What does Bc say? | * <del>'''[RC2?]'''{{bug|434837}} - sounds like something we really cannot ship with? What does Bc say?. </del> Comments from brenden and shaver says its not worth it. | ||
;Crashers [ss] | ;Crashers [ss] | ||