Confirmed users
130
edits
EU Copyright Consultation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→B. Is there a need for more clarity as regards the scope of what needs to be authorised (or not) in digital transmissions?
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
'''14. [In particular if you are a right holder or a service provider:] What would be the consequences of providing a legal framework enabling the resale of previously purchased digital content? Please specify per market (type of content) concerned.''' | '''14. [In particular if you are a right holder or a service provider:] What would be the consequences of providing a legal framework enabling the resale of previously purchased digital content? Please specify per market (type of content) concerned.''' | ||
In order to be effective, open and interoperable, a technical framework and standards would be needed on transfer of receipts/licenses/terms-of-use to the new owner - especially between different systems. | In order to be effective, open and interoperable, a technical framework and standards would be needed on transfer of receipts/licenses/terms-of-use to the new owner - especially between different systems. Legislation which immediately mandated an ability to resell might be technically unworkable, as such standards do not exist today. A legal framework that took this need for standards development into account would be a positive step, as long as it encouraged or did not obstruct open and interoperable technical solutions to manage the transfer. | ||
===C. Registration of works and other subject matter – is it a good idea?=== | ===C. Registration of works and other subject matter – is it a good idea?=== | ||