canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti
1,334
edits
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
* follow the history of a particular repository that does push-annotation of its incoming changesets | * follow the history of a particular repository that does push-annotation of its incoming changesets | ||
** This is kind of a big change. It's currently possible to store some annotations in the changeset, but that probably means you can't really annotate the changeset after committing. Is the latter what you want? [[User:DirkjanOchtman|DirkjanOchtman]] 00:58, 28 May 2008 (PDT) | ** This is kind of a big change. It's currently possible to store some annotations in the changeset, but that probably means you can't really annotate the changeset after committing. Is the latter what you want? [[User:DirkjanOchtman|DirkjanOchtman]] 00:58, 28 May 2008 (PDT) | ||
*** Yes, I really do want additional annotations after committing. I realize that they'd be detachable, but I think making them hard to detach accidentally would suffice. | |||
== Miscellaneous == | == Miscellaneous == | ||
* want to be able to update between two revisions that aren't ancestor/descendant without -C | * want to be able to update between two revisions that aren't ancestor/descendant without -C | ||
** I think this was shot down by mpm when it was discussed, though I agree with you. You should raise this issue in the mailing lists again if you dislike the current behavior. [[User:DirkjanOchtman|DirkjanOchtman]] 00:58, 28 May 2008 (PDT) | ** I think this was shot down by mpm when it was discussed, though I agree with you. You should raise this issue in the mailing lists again if you dislike the current behavior. [[User:DirkjanOchtman|DirkjanOchtman]] 00:58, 28 May 2008 (PDT) | ||