Contribute/Lifecycle/draft: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary
Line 236: Line 236:
|bgcolor="orange"|[[Contribute/Lifecycle/draft#Pre-Work|'''Pre-work''']]
|bgcolor="orange"|[[Contribute/Lifecycle/draft#Pre-Work|'''Pre-work''']]
|At this stage the risk is that they will remain resistant to inviting contributors into their part of the project.
|At this stage the risk is that they will remain resistant to inviting contributors into their part of the project.
Despite an activator being identified, that they are not empowered by their managers to take action, and they are not given resources or team support to be effective.  
Despite an activator being identified, that they are not empowered by their managers to take action, and they are not given resources or team support to be effective.  
The Activator role is tacked on “ in addition” to other work, and can be de-prioritized.  
 
The Activator role is tacked on “ in addition” to other work, and can be de-prioritized.
|-valign="top"
|-valign="top"
|bgcolor="Beau Blue"|[[Contribute/Lifecycle/draft#Starting | '''Starting''']]
|bgcolor="Beau Blue"|[[Contribute/Lifecycle/draft#Starting | '''Starting''']]
|Unconsciously Incompetent
|Awaiting your awesome input!
|-valign="top"
|-valign="top"
|bgcolor="red"|[[Contribute/Lifecycle/draft#Learning and Preparing for Growth| '''Learning and preparing for growth''']]
|bgcolor="red"|[[Contribute/Lifecycle/draft#Learning and Preparing for Growth| '''Learning and preparing for growth''']]
|Consciously Incompetent
|
*Activator has trouble or feels overwhelmed because they aren’t delegating
*There are no trusted community members to delegate to.
*The systems and data could be blocked technically or politically, or by bullshit.
|-valign="top"
|-valign="top"
|bgcolor="Barn red"|[[Contribute/Lifecycle/draft#Scaling| '''Scaling''']]
|bgcolor="Barn red"|[[Contribute/Lifecycle/draft#Scaling| '''Scaling''']]
|Consciously Competent
|
*Community coordinator will not be able to bring in new core contributors and leadership prior to running out of resources to sustain community.
*Community coordinator and core contributors will not successfully balance sense of ownership with openness.
*Gaps in the contribution pathway that affect growth will not be identified and/or addressed in order to facilitate sustained growth
|-valign="top"
|-valign="top"
|bgcolor="Asparagus"|[[Contribute/Lifecycle/draft#Sustaining| '''Sustaining''']]
|bgcolor="Asparagus"|[[Contribute/Lifecycle/draft#Sustaining| '''Sustaining''']]
|Unconscious Competence
|
*Organization will not actively support community growth by not allowing community to gain influence and voice.
*Community coordinator will not be able to rejuvenate community and bring in new core contributors and leadership prior to running out of resources to sustain community.
|}
|}


canmove, Confirmed users
868

edits

Navigation menu