Release Management/Release Notes Process: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Redirected page to Release Management/Release Notes)
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This is a proposal for the process by which we construct release notes, but does not represent a final decision.
#REDIRECT [[Release_Management/Release_Notes]]
 
=== Release/Channel Specific Notes ===
Can be displayed above "What's New" - please get in contact with Alex to change these.
 
=== What's New Section ===
(channel) notes for Firefox (n) should be pulled from
 
* bugs keyworded with "relnote"
 
OR
 
* [[Features/Release_Tracking]]
 
OR
 
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Firefox_10_for_developers
 
OR
 
* An email to Alex
 
OR
 
* has patch with approval-mozilla-(channel) added since the last merge date
* status-firefox(n) is "fixed"
 
=== Known Issues Section ===
Let's say we're about to push Firefox (n) to Aurora. To find known issues, we should look at all bugs that are
 
* status-firefox(n) is "affected" or "wontfix"
* tracking-firefox(n) is "?" or "+", or tracking-firefox(n+1) is "?" or "+"
 
OR
 
* keyworded with "relnote" (perhaps this should be an approval flag)
 
If a bug is keyworded/flagged with "relnote", the requestor can additionally specify whether or not additional testing is required, and if so, where bugs should be filed.
 
=== Updating Release Notes ===
 
All "Known Issues" (bugs) that do not have a fix date in the DB should be checked to see if they've subsequently been resolved in a newer Firefox version. This needs to happen on a weekly basis, since that's the cadence for Aurora/Beta.

Latest revision as of 15:00, 30 August 2022