QA/Execution/Web Testing/Browser Matrix: Difference between revisions
< QA | Execution | Web Testing
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
! Linux | ! Linux | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Firefox < 2.0.0.6 | | Firefox < = 2.0.0.6 | ||
| P1 | | P1 | ||
| | | P1 | ||
| | | P1 | ||
| | | P1 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Opera 9 | | Opera 9 | ||
| | | P2 | ||
| | | P2 | ||
| | | P2 | ||
| | | P2 | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Safari 2.0.4 | | Safari 2.0.4 | ||
| | | P1 | ||
| | | P1 | ||
| | | P1 | ||
| | | '''N/A''' | ||
|- | |- | ||
| Flock 0.9 | | Flock 0.9 |
Revision as of 19:59, 22 August 2007
Web browser testing matrix template
Windows XP SP2 | Windows Vista | Mac | Linux | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Firefox < = 2.0.0.6 | P1 | P1 | P1 | P1 |
Internet Explorer 7 | P1 | P1 | N/A | foo4 |
Internet Explorer 6 | P1 | N/A | N/A | foo4 |
Opera 9 | P2 | P2 | P2 | P2 |
Safari 2.0.4 | P1 | P1 | P1 | N/A |
Flock 0.9 | P2 | P2 | P2 | P2 |
Open issues:
1) Do we want to assume JS is always enabled?
2) What about popups?
3) Should we just test defaults?
4) What's considered a blocker? Do we want a tier system, much like Yahoo! has, WRT 'http://developer.yahoo.com/yui/articles/gbs/ graded support'?
5) Escalation policy if we find major issues?
6) How do we report on our testing results?