Mozilla 2/StatusMeetings/2008-05-21: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(link up summit2008 session proposals)
Line 20: Line 20:
* dmandelin
* dmandelin
* taras
* taras
**learning/simplifying ESP
* bsmedberg
* bsmedberg
** back! nothing much to report yet... want help with XPCOMGC
** back! nothing much to report yet... want help with XPCOMGC

Revision as of 18:02, 21 May 2008

« previous week | index | next week »

Mozilla 2 Meeting Details

  • Wednesdays - 11:00am Pacific, 2:00pm Eastern, 18:00 UTC
  • Mozilla Building S - <script> conference room
  • 650-903-0800 or 650-215-1282 x91 Conf# 217 (US/INTL)
  • 1-800-707-2533 (pin 369) Conf# 217 (US)
  • irc.mozilla.org #mmgc for backchannel

Followups

  • opening mozilla-central for general checkins is tracking bug 422754
    • some tests orange, again?
    • performance tests show Linux regression. Build team to try and narrow by running the buildbot steps against a FF3RC1 source tree
  • ActionMonkey build on windows fixed, hackily... core bug still open
  • Consolidated post-1.9 planning wiki pages are pending. Damons is merging the work week spreadsheets into a single location tbd.

Status Reports

  • jimb
  • dmandelin
  • taras
    • learning/simplifying ESP
  • bsmedberg
    • back! nothing much to report yet... want help with XPCOMGC
  • jorendorff
  • zweinberg

Discussion Topics

  • items of concern on the 1.9 planning sheet
    • Rework array reflection through IDL -- sounds like an API change that would break extensions for 1.9.1 with little immediate value
    • Fix proxies for non-threadsafe objects -- do we need this for 1.9.1, or can we instead pound on XPCOMGC which bypasses the problem altogether?
    • Reparent tabs -- sounds really scary, especially on a 6-week timeframe
    • content in general? Is everything listed as 1.9.1 really realistic in 6 weeks? Can we early cut and focus on the most important things?
    • JS in general -- we've loaded spidermonkey veterans on 1.9.1 and jorendorff/jimb on actionmonkey... perhaps we should rethink who's working on what so that we have some veterans helping with AM/moz2?
  • Please add discussion sessions to Summit2008/Sessions/Proposals: Tracing in general, actionmonkey... ?