Talk:Firefox:2.0 Product Planning/LI Plan Template: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
(from irc chat this morning) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
''good call; will add these sections --[[User:Beltzner|Beltzner]]'' | ''good call; will add these sections --[[User:Beltzner|Beltzner]]'' | ||
== from irc chat this morning == | |||
11:40 <@shaver> beltzner: what you have is a _great_ tool for helping us get a | |||
clearer picture of what a feature "is" | |||
11:41 <@shaver> beltzner: but I think that you do that tool a disservice by | |||
trying to use it to pound down the nail of "work status and | |||
ownership" | |||
11:42 *** beltzner ponders again | |||
11:42 <@shaver> and, honestly, I think it would be great if we didn't have a | |||
"who" clearly visible in the top of the feature description | |||
11:43 <@beltzner> I'm with you most of the way ... the thing that I still think | |||
has value, at least until we get cracking on impl, is the | |||
listing of target and owner and such | |||
11:43 <@shaver> because I'd rather let that play out of the basis of merit | |||
11:43 <@beltzner> which could get replaced by a bug as soon as one exists | |||
11:43 <@shaver> well | |||
11:43 <@shaver> I think that "scope out feature X" is a bug | |||
11:43 <@shaver> it's FIXED when the LI template is full to whatever level of | |||
quality and completeness is required | |||
11:44 <@mconnor> hmm, so create LI stubs, file bugs with those URLs, and file a | |||
bug blocking the parent bug to scope work? | |||
11:44 <@shaver> were I you (and I'm not, but I'm given to taht sort of | |||
projection at the moment) I would focus completely on the | |||
artifact itself | |||
11:45 <@shaver> and not bite off the whole how-do-we-get-to-that or | |||
what-happens-after-we-agree-on-a-feature battle yet | |||
11:45 <@shaver> mix that metaphor goooOOOoo! | |||
11:45 <@shaver> I think you will have more success getting good feedback and | |||
buy-in on the artifact | |||
11:47 <@beltzner> er, what's the artifact? | |||
11:47 <@beltzner> the template or the bug? | |||
11:47 <@shaver> the filled-in template | |||
11:48 <@shaver> "what is Browser Notification Service?" "it's the thing at | |||
wiki...." | |||
Revision as of 17:26, 22 November 2005
Would be good to have sections for impact on extensions, localization, and update.
good call; will add these sections --Beltzner
from irc chat this morning
11:40 <@shaver> beltzner: what you have is a _great_ tool for helping us get a
clearer picture of what a feature "is"
11:41 <@shaver> beltzner: but I think that you do that tool a disservice by
trying to use it to pound down the nail of "work status and
ownership"
11:42 *** beltzner ponders again
11:42 <@shaver> and, honestly, I think it would be great if we didn't have a
"who" clearly visible in the top of the feature description
11:43 <@beltzner> I'm with you most of the way ... the thing that I still think
has value, at least until we get cracking on impl, is the
listing of target and owner and such
11:43 <@shaver> because I'd rather let that play out of the basis of merit
11:43 <@beltzner> which could get replaced by a bug as soon as one exists
11:43 <@shaver> well
11:43 <@shaver> I think that "scope out feature X" is a bug
11:43 <@shaver> it's FIXED when the LI template is full to whatever level of
quality and completeness is required
11:44 <@mconnor> hmm, so create LI stubs, file bugs with those URLs, and file a
bug blocking the parent bug to scope work?
11:44 <@shaver> were I you (and I'm not, but I'm given to taht sort of
projection at the moment) I would focus completely on the
artifact itself
11:45 <@shaver> and not bite off the whole how-do-we-get-to-that or
what-happens-after-we-agree-on-a-feature battle yet
11:45 <@shaver> mix that metaphor goooOOOoo!
11:45 <@shaver> I think you will have more success getting good feedback and
buy-in on the artifact
11:47 <@beltzner> er, what's the artifact?
11:47 <@beltzner> the template or the bug?
11:47 <@shaver> the filled-in template
11:48 <@shaver> "what is Browser Notification Service?" "it's the thing at
wiki...."