Electrolysis/Release Criteria/Graphics: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(update tests status) |
(→talos webgl: updated test) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
=== talos webgl === | === talos webgl === | ||
* e10s comparison validated: | * e10s comparison validated: jgilbert | ||
* Current e10s diff: better or similar | * Current e10s diff: better or similar | ||
** Windows 7/8: 2-3% better | ** Windows 7/8: 2-3% better | ||
** Windows XP: 60% better | ** Windows XP: 60% better (and confirmed as reasonable) | ||
** Linux: same | ** Linux: same | ||
** OS X: 3% worse | ** OS X: 3% worse | ||
Revision as of 23:11, 24 February 2016
The graphics suites may regress a bit (up to 5%) if there are offsetting user benefits elsewhere.
RASCI:
- Responsible: ?
- Accountable: RyanVM
- Supporting: jmaher, graphics team
- Consulted:
- Informed: cpeterson, elan, release management
talos webgl
- e10s comparison validated: jgilbert
- Current e10s diff: better or similar
- Windows 7/8: 2-3% better
- Windows XP: 60% better (and confirmed as reasonable)
- Linux: same
- OS X: 3% worse
talos canvasmark
- e10s comparison validated: not yet, awaiting snorp
- Current e10s diff: better by 2-3% on all platforms
talos tsvgx
- e10s comparison validated: mstange
- Current e10s diff: 30-50% better on all platforms
- TODO: seems suspicious, requires further confirmation (bug: TBD)
talos tsvg_opacity
- e10s comparison validated: not valid (mattwoodrow)
- bug 1250717 - fix tsvg_opacity validity on e10s