DevTools/2011-03-02: Difference between revisions

From MozillaWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== Meeting Details == * Wednesday Mar. 2, 2010 - 9:00am Pacific, 12:00pm Eastern, 17:00 UTC * 650-903-0800 or 650-215-1282 x92 Conf# 275 * 1-800-707-2533 (pin 369) Conf# 275 (US...")
 
No edit summary
 
Line 8: Line 8:
== Notices ==
== Notices ==


* Web Console
** Repeated messages are collapsed into one
** Notifications for console events for extensibility purposes
* Firebug update
* Firebug update
** Progress made on memory leak. that's the last real blocker for Firebug 1.7
** https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=638075
** Users complained about the size of this dialog: http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/planet-mozilla/firebug-tip-disable-debugger-keyword/
** Making a smaller version of this is a blocker for Firebug 1.7
** Plan to release the last Firebug 1.7 alpha this week. Beta next week.
** Beta will be in AMO's beta channel
* Ace update
* Ace update
** Cloud9 IDE has launched http://c9.io
** Cloud9 IDE has launched http://c9.io
* Shippable units and our priorities now
* Shippable units and our priorities now
** kdangoor is breaking things down into smaller, shippable units
** to help with timed releases




== Roundtable ==
== Roundtable ==
* rcampbell: People should be aggressive about filing bugs against Jetpack or DevTools SDK.
** Bring things up on the mailing lists
* Surrogates vs.jschannel
** General consensus that having one solution for cross process communication would be a good thing, but that we need to move forward now.

Latest revision as of 17:36, 2 March 2011

Meeting Details

  • Wednesday Mar. 2, 2010 - 9:00am Pacific, 12:00pm Eastern, 17:00 UTC
  • 650-903-0800 or 650-215-1282 x92 Conf# 275
  • 1-800-707-2533 (pin 369) Conf# 275 (US)
  • #devtools on irc.mozilla.org for backchannel

Notices


Roundtable

  • rcampbell: People should be aggressive about filing bugs against Jetpack or DevTools SDK.
    • Bring things up on the mailing lists
  • Surrogates vs.jschannel
    • General consensus that having one solution for cross process communication would be a good thing, but that we need to move forward now.