MozillaWiki:Team/Meetings/2014-04-08
Wiki Working Group - 7 April 2014 3rd meeting
Last meeting's notes: https://wiki.mozilla.org/Contribute/Education/Wiki_Working_Group/Notes/2014-03-25
Attendees
(We'll start with quick introductions. Also, write your name down if you're in attendance.)
* Lyre Calliope / @CaptainCalliope * Justin Wood / Callek * Rahid * jd * Larissa * Gordon * Jennie * Surit (imsurit) * Joelle
Agenda / Notes
What does it mean to be a module peer?
Christie's suggestion:
1. help craft and drive the roadmap (take lead on atleast one committee)
* https://cbt.etherpad.mozilla.org/wwg-2014-roadmap
2. take an active part in any governance issues that arise 3. advocate for the wiki across the Mozilla community
- add something about decision-making and escalation paths - ask laura thompson for guidance, another person to ask is gerv
- Will folks remind me who would like to be a peer? (I didn't take note from our last meeting)
- Gordon
- Lyre Calliope
Organization Structure
- Organizational structure ( https://cbt.etherpad.mozilla.org/wwg-organizational-structure )
- Committees
- Task forces
- Gordon Came across this old link: https://cbt.etherpad.mozilla.org/wiki-improvement
- Lyre has a meeting with Jennie Rose on Wednesday and will talk with her about processing this document for current Wiki Working Group needs
Editorial Roadmap
https://cbt.etherpad.mozilla.org/wwg-2014-roadmap
Research
Presented by Joelle
To address "questions of clarity" about wiki's position within different projects, teams, groups
* How are people/groups currently using the Wiki? * How would people/groups like to use the Wiki?
What tools currently exist to gather data on wiki usage and maintenance?
* https://wikiapiary.com/wiki/MozillaWiki * https://wiki.mozilla.org/Special:SpecialPages * What else?
Where to begin? Who would like to go forward/assist with this? Short-term
* --Need to gather data analytics * --Survey groups
Long-term
* --Build dashboard(s) separate from the wiki that tracks usage
Other / Misc
- How can we clarify where people should file bugs?
- Can we get wiki.mozilla.org spun out into its own WebOps component?
^^ I would rather use the existing component under Websites. -ck
- Oh, I meant for the technical/IT side (Infra & Ops). -GPH
---> when you type in wiki.mozilla.org on https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi you get the option 1) if you type just "wiki" you don't see that option at first 1) Websites > wiki.mozilla.org 2) Infrastructure & Operations > WebOps: IT-Managed Tools
- Will someone help me get unstuck with this bug? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=987187
Action Items
- draft roadmap based on new governance/organizational structure
- track down GA person on web productions
- [Joelle, research-type folks] generate list of research questions
- christie and gordon to connect re spam issue
- Register the IRC channel and op relevant users
- Ping on-call in #it to get op permissions in order to register channel
- Determine how we want to handle long queries
Agenda item for next time:
Webmaker Wiki revamp
Presented by Matt Thompson
- http://openmatt.org/2014/03/25/open_scrum/
- https://wiki.mozilla.org/Webmaker
- This is what not to do.
- Uses HTML instead of wikimarkup.
- Wikimarkup tends to be cleaner and easier to maintain (once you get over the learning curve).
- Uses external links for wikilinks.
- Wikilinks help us get statistics from the built-in MediaWiki features (e.g. "What Links Here").
- Has super fancy styling that may get in the way. (This is subjective, of course.)
- Super fancy styling always requires a foray into HTML and/or CSS, and may clash with the skin (especially given that different people may be using different skins).
- Uses HTML instead of wikimarkup.
- This is what not to do.