Summit2008/Sessions/Proposals/Mozilla-Identity

From MozillaWiki
< Summit2008‎ | Sessions/Proposals
Revision as of 21:02, 1 July 2008 by Mitchell Baker (talk | contribs) (New page: = 2008 Summit Proposal = === Session Title === Mozilla Identity === Session Leaders === Mitchell Baker === Summary === === Background Materials === === Agenda === W...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

2008 Summit Proposal

Session Title

Mozilla Identity

Session Leaders

Mitchell Baker

Summary

Background Materials

Agenda

Working session to explore the Mozilla identity. I'll come with topics and some working ideas to start a discussion. I'd like to end up with a good sense of where agreement is obvious, where we have disagreements and where things are murky enough we're not sure. Those ideas will then be tested among a broader set of people.

  • What makes Mozilla Mozilla? What holds us together as a community, or a set of related communities?
    • Is it software?
    • Is it the Internet?
    • Human experience on the internet?
    • Open Source development?
    • Open processes?
  • How broad is the Mozilla identity?
    • one summary: build software, build communities, build the internet we want to live in
    • another summary: focus on the structure of the web being open - protocols, data formats, etc. and leave applying openness to content to other organizations
  • How broad could / should it be?
    • Are we *any* activity that is transparent, uses a shared resource and distributes decision making?
    • Is there a degree of breadth where "Mozilla" becomes so diffuse it's not enough for use to be an effective community?
    • How much does software ground us?
  • Social Movement and Community "Open Web," the "commons" the "sharing economy" all are active topics of exploration.
    • How does Mozilla relate to these?
    • Can / should the Mozilla community play a broader role in these developing phenomena?
    • If so, is this by strengthening and growing our community, or is it by helping export our techniques to other areas?