The CA's public documentation needs to provide sufficient information describing the steps taken by the CA to confirm that the certificate subscriber owns/controls the domain name to be included in the certificate. For instance, if a challenge-response type of procedure is used, then there needs to be a brief description of the process. If public resources are used, then there should be a description of which public resources are used, what data is retrieved from public resources, and how that data is used to verify that the certificate subscriber owns/controls the domain name.
It is '''not''' sufficient to simply reference section 11 of the [https://cabforum.org/baseline-requirements-documents/ CA/Brower Forum's Baseline Requirements (BR)]. BR #11.1.1 lists several ways in which the CA may confirm that the certificate subscriber owns/controls the domain name to be included in the certificate. Simply referencing section 11 of the BRs does not specify which of those options the CA uses, and is insufficient for describing how the CA conforms to the BRs. BR #8.2.1 says: "The CA SHALL develop, implement, enforce, and annually update a Certificate Policy and/or Certification Practice Statement that describes in detail how the CA implements the latest version of these Requirements."
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WHOIS WHOIS] is used by some CAs as a source of information for checking