64
edits
Tamarin:WeeklyUpdates: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Updates
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
** It will be eaiser if we merge things into tamarin redux as opposed to going back to tamarin central. | ** It will be eaiser if we merge things into tamarin redux as opposed to going back to tamarin central. | ||
** Nanojit in TC will become the canonical branch | ** Nanojit in TC will become the canonical branch | ||
** TC will not be using nanojit to do tracing immediately. Guards will only work in TraceMonkey. | ** TC will not be using nanojit to do tracing immediately. Guards will only work in TraceMonkey. | ||
** There was one feature that got lost in the merge (managing fragments), but it will be added back in. | |||
** (Andreas) Any plans for testing frameworks for nanojit specifically. (Edwin) We have started working on a generic C++ solution, no concrete plans. Possibly create a text file syntax for LIR use. Textual description of LIR. A LIR/C backend would be interesting as well. Need to do more brainstorming on this topic. | |||
** Load filter code made it into new version, may speed up guard. | |||
** Graydon's Status | |||
*** Started merge about a week ago. Passing most of the tests internally. One bug posted – 457786 (using the patch as of last night) '''ACTION''': Copy Edwin on this bug. | |||
*** Little bit of difficulty during integration, but all bugs solved and seems to work fine. | |||
*** Not touching any of the branch code. Tested only on Linux x86. | |||
*** X64 has not yet been tested | |||
*** Bugs were with redux code in general, Ed fixed them and they were integrated into redux code | |||
= Older meetings = | = Older meetings = | ||