E10s/Status/Dec17: Difference between revisions

E10s/Status/Dec17 (view source)

137 bytes removed , 18 December 2015

canmove, Confirmed users, Bureaucrats and Sysops emeriti

5,401

edits

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 #We are getting closer with our Plan of Record, but we're not quite there, yet.
-#
+#Although the team is working at a high velocity, we are not at zero M8's and we need to be by the first 2 weeks of Aurora which is Dec 28th. We don't want to take uplifts after that
-Decision Made: We have decided that we will lock APZ and e10s. Meaning that if APZ doesn't ship, we will hold on e10s until it is ready. APZ is Medium to low risk and is behind a preference so we can disable it if needed. APZ is currently enabled by default in Aurora 45, will ride the trains to Beta 45 and we will make a final Go/No-Go decision mid to late beta. Additionally, we are not blocking on Service Workers but are tracking issues we'd like to have fixed before 45 Beta, here: {{bug|1230621}}
+'''Decision Re-Made:''' We have decided that we will NOT lock APZ and e10s. Product has deemed that the difference in scrolling performance is not [add statement here] : {{bug|1230621}}
 Here are the documents being worked on for the POR: