Electrolysis/Meetings/2016-02-25: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
Fixed bug links
m (Fixed bug links)
Line 20: Line 20:
** Found that we're sending two sync IPC messages, one after the other, accounting for > 50% of the regression. Filed {{bug|1251032}}
** Found that we're sending two sync IPC messages, one after the other, accounting for > 50% of the regression. Filed {{bug|1251032}}
** We're also sending two sync IPC messages for IME. Filed {{bug|1251063}}
** We're also sending two sync IPC messages for IME. Filed {{bug|1251063}}
* Bug 666365 - Figure out what TabChild::SetVisibility needs to do
* {{Bug|666365}} - Figure out what TabChild::SetVisibility needs to do
** I have a needinfo on this, and it's taking me a while to sort this out. I _think_ we're doing the right thing by just having the TabChild be "visible" by default, but I haven't fully verified this yet.
** I have a needinfo on this, and it's taking me a while to sort this out. I _think_ we're doing the right thing by just having the TabChild be "visible" by default, but I haven't fully verified this yet.


Line 29: Line 29:


== gabor ==
== gabor ==
* {{bug|1179735}} (p1 perf, - tp5o_scroll regression) - APZ causing the regression, and it causes other regressions as well. bug 1144120 has some fresh data about other regressions.
* {{bug|1179735}} (p1 perf, - tp5o_scroll regression) - APZ causing the regression, and it causes other regressions as well. {{bug|1144120}} has some fresh data about other regressions.
* {{bug|1186585}} (p1 perf - 28.2% - 48.5% tps talos regression with e10s enabled) - did some profiling, it seems like the compositor spends more time in RecvUpdateNoSwap, I wonder why does that take more time in e10s. The compositor should do the same work for tab switch in both case no? It is not (just) APZ I tested it.
* {{bug|1186585}} (p1 perf - 28.2% - 48.5% tps talos regression with e10s enabled) - did some profiling, it seems like the compositor spends more time in RecvUpdateNoSwap, I wonder why does that take more time in e10s. The compositor should do the same work for tab switch in both case no? It is not (just) APZ I tested it.
* {{bug|1248806}} - (p1 crash - Recursive initialization of nsLayoutStatics when capability.policy.policynames is set) - this flag is used for various corporations for intranet and what not. Legacy stuff but it's important (Bobby tried to remove it once but had to put it back in the end for the high demand) I see a few solutions for the problem want to talk to Bobby or Boris about which one should I pick.
* {{bug|1248806}} - (p1 crash - Recursive initialization of nsLayoutStatics when capability.policy.policynames is set) - this flag is used for various corporations for intranet and what not. Legacy stuff but it's important (Bobby tried to remove it once but had to put it back in the end for the high demand) I see a few solutions for the problem want to talk to Bobby or Boris about which one should I pick.
Confirmed users
3,339

edits

Navigation menu