* [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/Mezqdljjerc/eHC0JDQwBgAJ Review Feedback on Japan GPKI's CP/CPS]
** Japan GPKI's CP/CPS did not contain sufficient detail, so discussion put on hold pending updated CP/CPS.
* A-Trust discussion [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/Q1beEDFdzxg/6ZILykF0AgAJ put on hold pending translation of CP/CPS into English].
* [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/uTBDhqO_IB0/bGWV7_lwBAAJ Review Feedback on ComSign's CP/CPS]
** ComSign's discussion was put on hold until the CP/CPS is updated to conform to either RFC 2527 or RFC 3647, as required by the Baseline Requirements. And be translated into English.
* [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/W0st0yN9bTM/14_-nZ7jGAAJ Review Feedback on SSC's CP/CPS]
** SSC's discussion was put on hold pending updated CP/CPS.
* [https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.security.policy/gKCqWRmBQ_8/A1eI_zsoAAAJ Review Feedback on ISRG's CP/CPS]
** ISRG's CP/CPS had enough detail, and there were minor corrections to be made.