WebExtensions/AdvisoryGroup: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 4: Line 4:


=Flow=
=Flow=
* Mark a bug as [advisory-group], this should be reserved for bugs that can't be resolved by the community. For example, sometimes security questions need more input. [https://mzl.la/2gfpi9s Existing bugs]


Bugs marked with these [design-decision...] are talked about in the bi-weekly community meeting:
When a bug comes into WebExtensions, there is a multiple triage process. Advisory group is the location of last resort for when we need help. Before hand we would expect at least a bug to:
 
Be marked with [design-decision-need] and talked about in the bi-weekly community meeting:


* Mark a bug as [design-decision-needed], [https://mzl.la/2d73PBq existing bugs]
* Mark a bug as [design-decision-needed], [https://mzl.la/2d73PBq existing bugs]
* If it sounds good it will get marked as [design-decision-approved], [https://mzl.la/2cXI6IH existing bugs]
* If it sounds good it will get marked as [design-decision-approved], [https://mzl.la/2cXI6IH existing bugs]
* Start sending in some patches for [design-decision-approved] bugs :)
* Start sending in some patches for [design-decision-approved] bugs :)
* If we still struggle with the bug, we'll mark it with [advisory-group]
Bugs marked with [advisory-group] will be handled in the regular advisory group meeting:
* Mark a bug as [advisory-group], this should be reserved for bugs that can't be resolved by the community. For example, sometimes security questions need more input. [https://mzl.la/2gfpi9s Existing bugs]


=Responsibilities=
=Responsibilities=
Confirmed users
1,158

edits

Navigation menu