3
edits
Add-on con: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
→Add-on-Con Feedback
| Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
* Awareness of AMO and what AMO does was high. | * Awareness of AMO and what AMO does was high. | ||
* We boosted Firefox 3.1 compatibility about 10% in the week following the conference so it was a good chance to raise some awareness about the need to track with current betas. There was a lot of discussion about this at the meet up the night before the conference and a bit at the conference itself. We should think about a preso that tells about who are beta users are, and how they are an important audience for addon developers as well. | * We boosted Firefox 3.1 compatibility about 10% in the week following the conference so it was a good chance to raise some awareness about the need to track with current betas. There was a lot of discussion about this at the meet up the night before the conference and a bit at the conference itself. We should think about a preso that tells about who are beta users are, and how they are an important audience for addon developers as well. | ||
* Really liked the fact that there were two tracks: one for technical and one for business. There was a whole lot of interest in the biz track around distribution of add-ons, business models, etc. The VC talk in particular provided a whole lot of good insight into that subject. | |||
'''What didn't work''' | '''What didn't work''' | ||